J. M. Kubler
To Win
T. Schoolkate
To Win
Tristan Schoolkate vs Altug Celikbilek Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W L L W W W
Form
W W W W W L W W W LHead To Head: Schoolkate 2 - 0 Celikbilek
They have played 4 sets in total, with Schoolkate winning 4 and Celikbilek winning 0. The last match between Schoolkate and Celikbilek was at the Chicago Challenger, 11-07-2023, First, Hard with Tristan Schoolkate getting the victory 6-4 7-6(2).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tristan Schoolkate | 2 |
| Altug Celikbilek | 0 |
Chicago Challenger(11-07-2023)
6
4
7
6
| Schoolkate | Stats | Celikbilek |
|---|---|---|
| 62% (18-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 122 | Ranking | 519 |
| 119 | Highest Rank | 154 |
| 24 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 4 | Titles | 9 |
| 59% (187-132) | Career Total W/L | 57% (382-283) |
| $458,850 | Career Prize Money | $231,155 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
26 Apr 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korda VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Medvedev VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Schoolkate VS Celikbilek H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Altug Celikbilek
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
9
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
6
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 7-5 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Altug Celikbilek
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
47%
(
34 of
72)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
77%
(
20 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
17 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Schoolkate VS Celikbilek H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 27 | Games Won | 21 |
| 17 | Aces (Total) | 15 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 1:45:45 | Average Match Time | 1:45:45 |
| 66% (92/140) | 1st Serve % | 47% (64/136) |
| 77% (71/92) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (48/64) |
| 63% (30/48) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (41/72) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 35% (47/136) | Return Points Win % | 28% (39/140) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tristan Schoolkate Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Hyeon Chung
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Ilia Simakin
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Rei Sakamoto
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
6
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
3
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
39 of
48)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Ethan Quinn
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Adam Walton
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
12
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Stefano Napolitano
64%
(
84 of
132)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
8
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
2
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
38%
(
50 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
128
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
48%
(
39 of
82)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
106)
16
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Altug Celikbilek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Altug Celikbilek
50%
(
1 of
2)
1st Serve %
80%
(
4 of
5)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
100%
(
1 of
1)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
6
Total Points Won
1
|
1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Pietro Marino
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Sekou Bangoura
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Maxence Bertimon
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Altug Celikbilek
57%
(
63 of
111)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
102)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
40%
(
19 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
44 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Kenny de Schepper
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
65 of
87)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
28 of
40)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Peter Buldorini
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Keshav Chopra
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
46 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Yassine Smiej
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (187/132) | Win/Loss | 57% (382/283) |
| 56% (419/327) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (852/690) |
| 53% (3813/3443) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7483/6938) |
| 59% (127/90) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (285/186) |
| 52% (24/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 43% (30/40) |
| 60% (15/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (60/48) |
| 68% (21/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 44% (7/9) |
| 0.61 | Aces Per Game | 0.38 |
| 2171 | Aces Total | 2685 |
| 0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1319 | Total Double Faults | 1819 |
| 1:45:18 | Average Match Time | 1:13:40 |
| 413.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 483.14 |
| 60% (13362/22128) | 1st Serve % | 58% (21317/36949) |
| 74% (9908/13362) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (15067/21317) |
| 48% (4241/8766) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7571/15632) |
| 40% (839/2109) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1624/3636) |
| 38% (8606/22442) | Return Points Win % | 40% (14655/36339) |
| 43% (6/8) | Slam W/L | 36% (5/9) |
| 60% (3/2) | Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 53% (8/7) |
| 46% (6/7) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (16/17) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (83/65) | Challenger W/L | 52% (117/108) |
| 64% (89/50) | Futures W/L | 63% (235/141) |
| 58% (182/312) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (375/652) |
| 67% (4/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 57% (4/7) |
| 50% (69/137) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (89/185) |
| 58% (57/99) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (122/212) |
| 90% (167/150) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (372/315) |
| 10% (167/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (372/57) |
| 24% (152/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (293/66) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
